🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 562+ reviews
Menβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Puma tuff mocc jersey jr slippers(NWT)

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (562 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Brand latest size 6 puma slippers with a hard sole on bottom

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery

↩️
handy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Puma tuff mocc jersey jr slippers(NWT)

Brand purely-arrived size 6 puma slippers with a hard sole on bottom

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 333072

Category: Men > Shoes > Slippers

Original Price: $25 USD

Sale Price: $15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6747 reviews
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable for my needs
the Puma tuff mocc jersey jr slippers(NWT) does its job and I’m satisfied. Arrived on time.
3 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Orlando, FL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid value for money
it works well enough and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
43 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
ideal Puma tuff mocc jersey jr slippers(NWT)
The Puma tuff mocc jersey jr slippers(NWT) looks similar to the listing photos.
39 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent find!
it does the job which feels reasonable.
36 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really terrific
So far, the Puma tuff mocc jersey jr slippers(NWT) works well enough and it’s fine overall.
27 people found this helpful